After reading some comments I came across one comment that stuck out to me. It was this one down below.
Now I don’t want it to seem like I’m picking favorites. Currently I’m choosing people that I trust to become admins but after some thinking I decided that isn’t really fair for others. It would be fairer if we choose a trustworthy person altogether to filter our speech and control parts of this website instead of just me choosing.
Nothing in this post is official, but if most of the people on this website believe that having a mini-election is the best course of action, then why not? I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions in the comments.
Ethan Lin 
Faris Khalid
I agree. I barely know you Ehab; some people may be fit for the job, and others may not be. An election will sort this out.
oh i legit just posted an article about it bruh
I think that you should keep Kevin as admin
we should elect from scratch
I feel Ehab should choose 3 people that will run. That way, there are not too many people running, and I trust he will choose good people. I don’t want any of my opinions to influence his decision, but I did post an article about it so read it if you want.
How about we give the current admins a try before we remove them?
wdym it’s not guaranteed that all the current admins will be removed
i dont think current admins should be removed, just add 1 more for 5
[…] minutes before I posted this article, Ehab posted an article related to this. It is right here: Ehab.Lawz.Online Admin Election. – Ehab.Lawz.OnlineWhat he essentially said was he wasn’t picking favorites, and we may hold a mini election. […]